Skip to content

References

[1]
W. C. Booth, G. G. Colomb, J. M. Williams, J. Bizup, and W. T. FitzGerald, The craft of research. University of Chicago Press, 2024. Available: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo215874008.html
[2]
The University of Chicago, The chicago manual of style online. University of Chicago Press, 2026. Available: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/book/ed18/frontmatter/toc.html
[3]
M. Forsyth, The elements of eloquence: How to turn the perfect english phrase. Icon Books, 2013. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Eloquence
[4]
R. Olson, Houston, we have a narrative: Why science needs story. University of Chicago Press, 2015. Available: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo21174162.html
[5]
S. Pinker, The sense of style: The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. Penguin Books Limited, 2014. Available: https://stevenpinker.com/publications/sense-style-thinking-persons-guide-writing-21st-century
[6]
H. Sword, Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press, 2012. Available: https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674064485
[7]
J. M. Williams and J. Bizup, Style: Lessons in clarity and grace. Pearson Education, 2013. Available: https://books.google.se/books/about/Style.html?id=HSotAAAAQBAJ
[8]
S. P. Jones and A. Bundy, “How to write a great research proposal.” 2016. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/academic-program/how-to-write-a-great-research-proposal/
[9]
A. Ramdas, “Checklist for effectively writing grants in stat-ML.” Aug. 2024. Available: https://stat.cmu.edu/~aramdas/checklists2/aadi-grant-checklist.pdf
[10]
M. Ernst, “Getting an academic job.” 2024. Available: https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~mernst/advice/academic-job.html
[11]
Anonymous, “Applying for a PostDoc.” 2026. Available: https://www.findapostdoc.com/advice/postdoc-applications.aspx
[12]
P. Fisher, A. K. Glasmeier, A. Grossman, L. Kolodziejski, and J. Livengood, “Academic interviews and offers panel discussion.” Mar. 2018. Available: https://youtu.be/gHVGvtTTV94
[13]
MIT Career Advising & Professional Development, “Academic interviews (faculty positions).” 2021. Available: https://capd.mit.edu/resources/academic-interviews-faculty-positions/
[14]
MIT Career Advising & Professional Development, “Faculty job search guide.” 2026. Available: https://capd.mit.edu/faculty-job-search-guide/
[15]
MIT Career Advising & Professional Development, “Application materials for a faculty job search.” 2026. Available: https://capd.mit.edu/resources/application-materials-for-a-faculty-job-search/
[16]
MIT Career Advising & Professional Development, “Finding a good postdoc: Tips & resources.” 2021. Available: https://capd.mit.edu/resources/finding-a-good-postdoc-tips-resources/
[17]
N. Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, “Master government list of federally funded r&d centers.” U.S. National Science Foundation, 2026. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/resource/master-gov-lists-ffrdc
[18]
T. Nguyen, “Demystifying PhD admissions in computer science.” 2026. Available: https://roars.dev/phd-cs-us/demystify.pdf
[19]
C. Pancerella, “Strategies for your career at a national laboratory.” 2020. Available: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1829249
[20]
G. Seo, “Negotiating your job offer(s) inside & outside academia.” 2024. Available: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nkrusch/awesome-research-guides/refs/heads/files/negotiating-your-job-offers.pdf
[21]
D. Tupa, “Strategies for seeking a job at a national lab,” Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM, USA, Sep. 2020. doi: 10.2172/1659149.
[22]
G. Walia, “Faculty job interview questions.” 2023. Available: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nkrusch/awesome-research-guides/refs/heads/files/interview-questions.pdf
[23]
S. Wilson, “Guide for the tenure-track job market in computer/information sciences.” 2019. Available: https://shomir.net/tt_job_guide.html
[24]
J. M. Wing, “Tips on the interview process.” 2000. Available: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~emigration/interview.pdf
[25]
Y. Yue, “Tips for computer science faculty applications.” 2024. Available: https://yisongyue.medium.com/checklist-of-tips-for-computer-science-faculty-applications-9fd2480649cc
[26]
Anonymous, “How science goes wrong,” The Economist, Oct. 2013, Available: https://www.chem.ucla.edu/dept/Faculty/merchant/pdf/How_Science_Goes_Wrong.pdf
[27]
E. Berger, “Getting your research adopted.” Jul. 2022. Available: https://youtu.be/59BZTVOM-dI
[28]
E. W. Dijkstra, “The three golden rules for successful scientific research,” E.W. Dijkstra Archive, EWD637, 1978. Available: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~EWD/transcriptions/EWD06xx/EWD637.html
[29]
M. Karamanis, “The machines are fine. I’m worried about us.” 2026. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20260827020720/https://ergosphere.blog/posts/the-machines-are-fine/
[30]
M. desJardins, “How to succeed in graduate school: A guide for students and advisors: Part i of II,” XRDS, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 3–9, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1145/197149.197154.
[31]
P. Nelson Limerick, “Dancing with professors: The trouble with academic prose,” The New York Times, pp. 7, p. 3, Oct. 1993, Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20250103165735/https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/books/dancing-with-professors-the-trouble-with-academic-prose.html
[32]
J. F. Kaiser, “Transcription of hamming’s "you and your research".” Bell Communications Research Colloquium Seminar, Mar. 07, 1986. Available: https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html
[33]
R. Hamming, “You and your research.” Bell Communications Research Colloquium Seminar, Jun. 06, 1995. Available: https://youtu.be/a1zDuOPkMSw
[34]
Anonymous, “Beall’s list.” Jan. 2017. Available: https://beallslist.net
[35]
G. Cormode, “How NOT to review a paper: The tools and techniques of the adversarial reviewer,” SIGMOD Rec., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 100–104, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1145/1519103.1519122.
[36]
B. Dahlberg, “Cornell food researcher’s downfall raises larger questions for science,” NPR, Sep. 2018, Available: https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2018/09/26/651849441/cornell-food-researchers-downfall-raises-larger-questions-for-science
[37]
A. Delpeuch and A. Amarilli, “No free view? No review!” 2020. Available: https://nofreeviewnoreview.org
[38]
Y. Dulek, S. Jeffery, C. Majenz, C. Schaffner, F. Speelman, and R. de Wolf, “A guide for new program committee members at theoretical computer science conferences,” 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2105.02773.
[39]
N. Elmqvist, “Mistakes reviewers make.” Feb. 01, 2026. Available: https://niklaselmqvist.medium.com/mistakes-reviewers-make-ce3a4c595aa2
[40]
T. C. S. for Future, “Low-CO2 research paper,” Aug. 2025. Available: https://tcs4f.org/low-co2-v1
[41]
M. L. Littman, “Collusion rings threaten the integrity of computer science research,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 43–44, May 2021, doi: 10.1145/3429776.
[42]
open access network, “Green, gold, and diamond open access.” Jul. 2026. Available: https://open-access.network/en/information/open-access-primers/green-and-gold
[43]
I. Parberry, “A guide for new referees in theoretical computer science,” SIGACT News, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 92–99, Nov. 1989, doi: 10.1145/74074.74090.
[44]
A. J. Smith, “The task of the referee,” Computer, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 65–71, 1990, doi: 10.1109/2.55470.
[45]
D. Stutz, “Some lessons on reviews and rebuttals.” Feb. 2025. Available: https://davidstutz.de/some-lessons-on-reviews-and-rebuttals/
[46]
Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT), “The diamond reviewer pledge.” 2026. Available: http://forrt.org/diamond-reviewer
[47]
T. Van Hoosear, “After grad student suicide, misconduct findings, university suspends professor,” Retraction Watch, Mar. 2021, Available: https://retractionwatch.com/2021/03/16/after-grad-student-suicide-misconduct-findings-university-suspends-professor/
[48]
A. Zeller, “Reviewer-author collusion rings and how to fight them.” Dec. 07, 2025. Available: https://andreas-zeller.info/2025/12/07/Reviewer-Author-Collusion-Rings-and-How-to-Fight-Them.html
[49]
U. of R. M. C. Edward G. Miner Library, “Introduction to research metrics.” Aug. 2026. Available: https://libguides.urmc.rochester.edu/ResearchMetrics
[50]
Center for Scientific Integrity, “Retraction watch.” 2010. Available: https://retractionwatch.com
[51]
G. Busl and M. Capdevielle, “The elevator pitch: Presenting your research in conversation.” Aug. 29, 2012. Available: https://graduateschool.nd.edu/assets/76988/elevator_pitch_8_28_2012.pdf
[52]
M. Ernst, “Making a technical poster.” Oct. 29, 2019. Available: https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~mernst/advice/poster.html
[53]
M. Ernst, “How to give a technical presentation.” Mar. 21, 2022. Available: https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~mernst/advice/giving-talk.html
[54]
J. Esparza, “How i give a talk.” Jul. 13, 2021. Available: https://youtu.be/WVnmgUakDzs
[55]
L. Lampropoulos, “How (not) to give a great research talk.” Jan. 17, 2023. Available: https://youtu.be/27vMdYA6RcA
[56]
Light Tracer, “Will a laser pointer show up in a screen share?” Sep. 25, 2026. Available: https://light-tracer.com/laser-pointer-screen-share-zoom-teams/
[57]
K. M. Naegle, “Ten simple rules for effective presentation slides,” PLOS Computational Biology, vol. 17, no. 12, p. e1009554, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009554.
[58]
I. Parberry, “How to present a paper in theoretical computer science.” 2000. Available: https://ianparberry.com/pubs/speaker.pdf
[59]
S. P. Jones, “How to give a great research talk.” Jul. 26, 2016. Available: https://simon.peytonjones.org/great-research-talk/
[60]
P. Winston, “How to speak.” Jan. 2018. Available: https://youtu.be/Unzc731iCUY
[61]
E. Berger, S. Blackburn, M. Hauswirth, and M. Hicks, “Empirical evaluation guidelines,” The ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN), Oct. 2018. Available: https://www.sigplan.org/Resources/EmpiricalEvaluation/
[62]
D. Beyer, S. Löwe, and P. Wendler, “Reliable benchmarking: Requirements and solutions,” International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–29, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10009-017-0469-y.
[63]
BITSS, “Guide for accelerating computational reproducibility in the social sciences.” Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences, Sep. 20, 2022. Available: https://bitss.github.io/ACRE/
[64]
S. M. Blackburn et al., “Can you trust your experimental results?” Evaluate Collaboratory, Feb. 2012. Available: https://evaluate.inf.usi.ch/sites/default/files/EvaluateCollaboratoryTR1.pdf
[65]
T. A. of Computing Machinery, “ACM artifact review and badging,” The Association of Computing Machinery, Aug. 2020. Available: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current
[66]
C. Curtsinger and E. D. Berger, “STABILIZER: Statistically sound performance evaluation,” SIGPLAN Not., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 219–228, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1145/2499368.2451141.
[67]
G. Heiser, “Benchmarking crimes.” 2011. Available: https://gernot-heiser.org/benchmarking-crimes.html
[68]
T. Hoefler and R. Belli, “Scientific benchmarking of parallel computing systems: Twelve ways to tell the masses when reporting performance results,” in Proceedings of the international conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis, in SC15. ACM, Nov. 2015, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1145/2807591.2807644.
[69]
R. Padhye, “Artifact evaluation: Tips for authors.” Aug. 07, 2019. Available: https://blog.padhye.org/Artifact-Evaluation-Tips-for-Authors/
[70]
E. A. for Programming Languages and Systems, “EAPLS artifact badges,” European Association for Programming Languages; Systems, May 2021. Available: https://eapls.org/eapls/artifact-badges/
[71]
P. Ralph et al., “Empirical standards for software engineering research,” the ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering (SIGSOFT), Apr. 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.03525.
[72]
M. Rapoport, “Proof artifacts: Guidelines for submission and reviewing.” 2018. Available: https://proofartifacts.github.io/guidelines/
[73]
L. Röseler et al., “Handbook for reproduction and replication studies,” Zenodo, Sep. 2025. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17062133.
[74]
P. Wendler and D. Beyer, “BenchExec.” Jul. 2026. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1163552.
[75]
P. R. Van-Lane et al., “Best practices in software citation.” 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2610.00528.
[76]
N. Rusch, “Introduction to artifact evaluation.” Apr. 2024. Available: https://nkrusch.github.io/files/aec-intro.pdf
[77]
J. Cham, “PhD comics.” 1997. Available: https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive_list.php
[78]
R. Munroe, “xkcd.” 2005. Available: https://xkcd.com
[79]
R. P. Barazzutti, “Co-authorship distance computation.” 2014. Available: https://www.csauthors.net/distance
[80]
M. Wang, “The PhD simulator.” 2023. Available: https://research.wmz.ninja/projects/phd/index.html
[81]
J. Eisner, “How to read a technical paper.” 2009. Available: https://www.cs.jhu.edu/~jason/advice/how-to-read-a-paper.html
[82]
T. H. C. W. Center, “Conclusions.” The Harvard College Writing Center, 2023. Available: https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/conclusions
[83]
M. Hicks, “How to write a technical paper.” Jun. 2022. Available: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nkrusch/awesome-research-guides/refs/heads/files/how-to-write-a-technical-paper.pdf
[84]
S. Keshav, “How to read a paper,” SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 83–84, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1145/1273445.1273458.
[85]
D. E. Knuth, T. Larrabee, and P. M. Roberts, “Mathematical writing,” Stanford University, 1987. Available: https://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/reviewing-papers/knuth_mathematical_writing.pdf
[86]
A. Lamott, “Shitty first drafts,” in Language awareness: Readings for college writers, 2005, pp. 93–96. Available: https://wrd.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/1-Shitty%20First%20Drafts.pdf
[87]
L. Lamport, “Writing papers.” 1987. Available: https://youtu.be/ey3BEtt9QLI?t=263
[88]
Mattt, “Semantic line breaks.” 2019. Available: https://sembr.org
[89]
L. McEnerney, “The craft of writing effectively.” Jun. 26, 2014. Available: https://youtu.be/vtIzMaLkCaM
[90]
I. C. of Medical Journal Editors, “Defining the role of authors and contributors,” International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), Jan. 2026. Available: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
[91]
B. C. Pierce and R. Alur, “Writing and speaking with style,” University of Pennsylvania, 2021. Available: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_vBXbugoLjO171w3wovs3ugmRQI-O6EcSVFDBF7eUzE/edit?usp=sharing
[92]
B. Pierce, “Imagine the reader.” The ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN), Jan. 17, 2023. Available: https://popl23.sigplan.org/details/PLMW-POPL-2023-papers/1/-Imagining-the-Reader
[93]
W. Pugh, “Advice to authors of extended abstracts.” The ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN), 2014. Available: https://www.sigplan.org/Resources/Advice/Pugh/
[94]
M. Püschel, “Small guide to making nice tables.” Jun. 28, 2008. Available: https://people.inf.ethz.ch/markusp/teaching/guides/guide-tables.pdf
[95]
N. Ramsey, “Learn technical writing in two hours per week,” Harvard University, Oct. 2006. Available: https://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/pubs/learn-two.pdf
[96]
N. Ramsey, “Teach technical writing in two hours per week,” Harvard University, Oct. 2006. Available: https://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/pubs/two.pdf
[97]
P. R. Halmos, “How to write mathematics.” 1973. Available: https://entropiesschool.sciencesconf.org/data/How_to_Write_Mathematics.pdf
[98]
M. Shaw, “Writing good software engineering research papers,” in 25th international conference on software engineering, 2003. proceedings., 2003, pp. 726–736. doi: 10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201262.
[99]
J. Shewchuk, “Three sins of authors in computer science and math.” 1997. Available: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jrs/sins.html
[100]
M. N. Wegman, “What it’s like to be a POPL referee; or how to write an extended abstract so that it is more likely to be accepted,” SIGPLAN Not., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 91–95, May 1986, doi: 10.1145/14947.14955.